[aur-general] A bit strange - unusual packages
Rob Til Freedmen
rob.til.freedman at gmail.com
Sun Sep 28 22:40:37 UTC 2014
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> CCed to the maintainer of these packages.
> lib32- prefix is used for the 32bit packages that are meant to be used
> with 64bit Arch, ie. with arch=('x86_64'). However, all your
> lib32-distrho-* packages are arch=('i686'). You should provide only
> one package that is arch=('x86_64' 'i686') for this.
> You can use conditions in a PKGBUILD, if you need to use different
> sources for i686 and x86_64.
> I will delete the lib32-distrho-* packages in a few days.
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rob Til Freedmen
> <rob.til.freedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> These packages are a bit strange in that they install binaries for
>> x86_64 with following PKGBUILD's
>> and x86 binaries with these PKGBUILD's
>> Both groups install binaries to /usr/lib/lv2/
>> My understanding of lib32 packages are that they provide 32bit
>> libaries in a x86_64 environment installed to /usr/lib32,
>> eg arch=('x86_64') but installing to /usr/lib32
>> Source code is provided (with a small update) - for which I've created
>> They correspond to distrho-git which builds separate packages for lv2,
>> dssi etc.pp.
these packages by luispa are still online.
I suggest deleting those packages - not only the lib32-xxx
but also their counter part
- without lib32 but having arch=('x86_64')
More information about the aur-general