[aur-general] Dell 2155cdn driver PKGBUILD quality check

Peter Tobler peter at tobler.cc
Sat Dec 26 11:36:59 UTC 2015


nope, there only is a 32-bit version available (which works fine on 64-bit).

This isn't really a binary, but it contains CUPS executable filters.
Should I still tag it as -bin? I have checked the other printer
drivers and they don't use this naming scheme.


On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Tobler <peter at tobler.cc> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply, here the amended version (including
> systemd restart of the cups service):
> PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/pastes/10653442/text?key=pfryf0g6mecwu5nyd64a
> install: http://pastie.org/private/coqawo5r7xaiviekh39iq
> Am I ready to go?
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Doug Newgard <scimmia at archlinux.info> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100
>> Peter Tobler <peter at tobler.cc> wrote:
>>> Hi all, and happy holidays,
>>> I am about to upload the PKGBUILD for the Dell 2155cn/cdn printer
>>> driver and thought someone should take a look at it before I submit.
>>> Please let me know if you spot any mistakes or find there are
>>> improvements that should be made.
>>> Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD:
>>> http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Peter
>> There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore,
>> pacman supports architecture specific arrays now (depends_i686, etc).
>> bsdtar will extract rpm files, no reason to pull in rpmextract.
>> Make sure you quote any paths that include any variables that you don't
>> control, like ${pkgdir} and ${srcdir}.

More information about the aur-general mailing list