[aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR
ngoonee.talk at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 01:09:34 UTC 2015
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Johannes Löthberg
<johannes at kyriasis.com> wrote:
> Not all spam is automated , so just requiring a CAPTCHA wouldn't be very
> useful. I think a slightly better approach would be to add the comment to a
> queue if it fails the spam filter, and require a TU to approve it.
Seems like a lot of unnecessary work for TUs though. Maybe it would be
better for maintainers approval to be required for posts that fail a
spam filter (they could just ignore it). Even if its not really spam,
its probably aimed at the maintainer anyway.
More information about the aur-general