[aur-general] AUR4, git, subtrees ELI5?

[Eli Schwartz]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:01 AM, David Kaylor <dpkaylor at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just tweaked the language in the wiki a bit.
>
> My point is that if one of the objectives is to force more discipline among
> maintainers going forward, then there is no reason to hide that fact. I
> suspect it would be more accurate to say you see it as a "fortunate side
> affect" of modernizing and increasing the maintainable of the AUR, which I
> think you have achieved with AUR4. And I agree with you on that.
>

Nice work!

-- Eli Schwartz