[aur-general] pandoc in community vs. pandoc-bin
j.e.vasquez.v at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 00:43:06 UTC 2015
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz
<karol.blazewicz at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez
> <j.e.vasquez.v at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
>> AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
> Try to find out what compile options does the upstream -bin one use or
> ask on pandoc mailing list. BTW, http://pandoc.org/installing.html
> links to a nonexistent AUR package instead to the brand new pandoc
> package from the repos.
It sounds the old AUR package "haskell-pandoc" pointed by
"http://pandoc.org/installing.html", which is no longer available, is
the same new community "pandoc" package. How complete or incomplete
is that pandoc package I wouldn't know. Installing from source uses
"cabal", whereas the PKGBUILD for pandoc uses "runhaskell" directly
with several options.
I'm not a haskell guy, so I can't tell, but it seems that pandoc plus
other community pandoc packages, might be equivalent to the pandoc-bin
I'll just try it out.
More information about the aur-general