[aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

[Giancarlo Razzolini]

Em março 22, 2017 18:12 Doug Newgard escreveu:
> 
> There's no specific rule about it. Some packagers will include packages in base
> in the depends, some won't. It's completely up to them.
> 

But, if at least the maintainers built their packages using a clean chroot, they
would know what they are missing from base to include on depends. I don't think
we need to enforce that rule to the AUR, but it is a rule for repo packages for
a good reason. We could, however, suggest on the wiki, if it isn't already, that
even for the AUR, the *maintainers* build their packages using devtools.

Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 870 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20170323/1b158084/attachment.asc>