[aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

[Tharre]

On 03/29, LoneVVolf wrote:
> It looks like many here haven't looked at base group in a while,
> or don't distinguish between base group and core repository.
>
> example :
> systemd-sysvcompat is in base, systemd is NOT .
> Both are in core repo .
>
> LW

systemd-sysvcompat depends on systemd (obviously), thus systemd is
effectively part of the base group. So I don't really get your point?

--
PGP ID: 0xC8F0B2F4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20170330/fc204ab4/attachment.asc>