[aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

[Robin Broda]

On 12/11/18 8:45 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> On 12/11/18 8:30 PM, Alad Wenter wrote:
> 
>> Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion...
>>
>> Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new
>> applications per month. That makes a thorough review difficult.
>>
>> Considering the positive experiences of the sponsor, it would be a shame
>> to let a voting period pass. That said, I'm not sure we have sufficient
>> information - at present - to proceed with such a voting period in a
>> meaningful manner.

I agree

>> So about Foxboron's question for confirmation: "Say one or two people
>> confirm they think the voting process should be continued after the
>> discussion has ended?" - I don't know.

> Let's try to get the ball rolling by asking some questions.
.. snip ..
> 3. I have no idea on what some of your more complicated packages do, or
> why they would require said complexity, e.g. iup. [2] Perhaps you could
> explain a bit on that regard.

Taking a closer look at iup, what's with the `sed`ding in prepare()?
- those should be patches, as sed will silently fail when they stop applying
- why do you explicitly link iupview statically?

Also, the url is reachable via https - you should maybe update that.

-- 
Rob (coderobe)

O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20181211/6fed4700/attachment.asc>