[aur-general] Account Suspended, No Reason Given
shoober420
shoober420 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 03:13:48 UTC 2018
I did indeed try to contact the maintainer of sdl2-hg about half a
year ago, and I also did comment in comment section that I do indeed
have a PKGBUILD ready. I promise you I did this for "sdl2-hg". My
fault for bottom posting, I was on my phone.
On 11/3/18, shoober420 <shoober420 at gmail.com> wrote:
> That bug is so important, it is linked on the Arch wiki itself.
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Steam/Troubleshooting#Segmentation_fault_when_disabling_runtime
>
> Maybe you are glamorizing your own perception of me onto the world Jason. I
> do a lot for Arch, and this community. Do you maintain any packages and
> debug, or just moderate the forums?
>
> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, shoober420 <shoober420 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have contributed to Arch, and Linux very much so. Especially for Steam.
>> Here’s a fine example.
>>
>> https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/3863
>>
>> This was discovered and resolved by yours truly. A lot of painstaking and
>> debugging went into diagnosing that bug. I love Arch, and do a lot for
>> this
>> community. You should concentrate on all the good I have done, instead of
>> all the supposed bad things I’ve done.
>>
>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, shoober420 <shoober420 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Regardless of my past, I still haven’t been given a reason to being
>>> rejected for maintaining “sdl2-hg”, when I have a PKGBUILD ready to
>>> upload.
>>> I have a lot of AUR packages to contribute, and its being halted by
>>> misunderstandings of my humor. I can argue me being banned from the
>>> forums
>>> were misunderstandings as well.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, Jason Ryan via aur-general <
>>> aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03/11/18 at 10:34pm, Mark Weiman wrote:
>>>> > On Sat, 2018-11-03 at 22:09 -0400, shoober420 via aur-general wrote:
>>>> > > This still doesn't cover up the fact you gave NO WARNING before the
>>>> > > suspension. Also, if you so desire 'high quality', and strive for
>>>> > > this
>>>> > > "political correctness", don't be a hypocrite and comment back the
>>>> > > very way you don't want to be talked to. That doesn't give the
>>>> > > impression of what you want achieved does it? This was all in fun
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > humor, not disrespect, and could have easily been diagnosed and
>>>> > > resolved if you talked to me about this before making such a
>>>> > > drastic
>>>> > > decision.
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > This has nothing to do with "political correctness" and has to do
>>>> > with
>>>> > the fact that you sent multiple requests, one after another, that
>>>> > were
>>>> > denied with language that didn't really help the TUs know your
>>>> > intent.
>>>> >
>>>> > The TUs are volunteers (probably have other important things to do as
>>>> > well) and I wouldn't expect them to put any time into requests like
>>>> > the
>>>> > ones listed and just deny them.
>>>> >
>>>> > You only getting a week suspension "without warning" is quite
>>>> > reasonable.
>>>> >
>>>> Given that OP was permabanned from the forums after repeated warnings
>>>> and
>>>> temporary bans, I would describe it as “unduly charitable”.
>>>>
>>>> /J
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> http://jasonwryan.com/
>>>> GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
>>>>
>>>>
>
More information about the aur-general
mailing list