[aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

Sébastien Luttringer seblu at seblu.net
Sun Nov 11 22:09:56 UTC 2018

On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:29 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> ## Issues
> * Existing Trusted Users are not followed closely in their actions, and  the
> quality of some packages for instance is more than questionable.
Do you have several example to show?
> * New applications are not carefully reviewed, and a several TUs seem
> to  just vote “Yes” by default.
From which facts are this assumption is built from?
> * There is a general feeling of decreasing/not high enough quality in  the
> packages provided in the community/ repository.
Idem. What elements do you have to support this feeling ?
> * The implication of some TUs in the distribution is very limited  outside of
> packaging.
What's wrong with that?

Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 821 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20181111/b3262605/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list