[aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

Santiago Torres-Arias santiago at archlinux.org
Mon Nov 12 16:54:50 UTC 2018

> The word "council" may just be bad choice here as people obviously fear
> the goal is to establish power to a few. This is to the same degree
> about power as having forum mods, bug wranglers, wiki admins, master key
> holders and devops is about having power: Not at all.

Agreed. If the term for the council was changed to "working groups"
would that be better?

> I agree iterating over sponsorship and co-maintaining will certainly
> improve some of this. But I can as well imagine some "sub-duties" could
> help to address the other problems. For time being I don't have a strong
> opinion or idea how that exactly could look like but i can ensure it
> shall indeed not be about power in any way described in this thread.

Agreed. I personally don't want to add more power to certain users over
others, and I think that's what the general consensus is leaning

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20181112/5fda72d5/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list