[aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

[Eli Schwartz]

On 1/7/19 1:20 PM, JereBear wrote:
>> Also I think all previous cases of people using local:// in a PKGBUILD
>> did not use "/filename", so we were happily parsing it as an authority.
>> You've actually broken the aurweb in a practical way by actually caring
>> about the RFC. :D
> 
> That's gratifying!
> 
> This bug appears to affect only the aurweb's UI, and not makepkg, so I
> think it's safe to leave the package as-is.
> 
> I'm going to re-read the relevant RFCs over the next few days to make
> sure I'm not barking up the wrong tree.

BTW I did submit
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2019-January/004619.html
which I think should fix this.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20190107/b928f950/attachment.asc>