[aur-general] [PATCH][tu-bylaws]: raise threshold of sponsors to two

[Santiago Torres-Arias]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:55:47AM -0200, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em janeiro 8, 2019 0:23 Santiago Torres via aur-general escreveu:
> > - Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
> > - Have two TUs actually decide to support this canididate
> 
> I'm fine with the patch, but these two lines are ambiguous. Are the TUs that are
> going to review the PKGBUILD's the same as the sponsors? 

This is a good point. My understanding is that sponsors generally do a
preliminary review, yet everyone is encouraged to continue reviewing any
PKGBUILDS during the discussion period.

> Also, if we are heading
> this direction of having a different set, other than the sponsors, of TUs requiring
> to review the PKGBUILD's, shouldn't this also be added to the bylaws?

This is also true. I'm not sure if that's something we want to put in
the bylaws or it's just somewhat of an untold rule/expectation.

What're everyone's thoughts on this?

Thanks,
-Santiago.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20190108/5e315818/attachment.asc>