From mail at akurei.me Thu Dec 3 10:22:41 2020 From: mail at akurei.me (Michael Duell) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:22:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please delete arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro Message-ID: <115b144c-8470-2738-20ce-841d5025c5d0@akurei.me> Please delete the package arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro from AUR. I disowned it. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 236 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From me at the-compiler.org Thu Dec 3 10:42:02 2020 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:42:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please delete arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro In-Reply-To: <115b144c-8470-2738-20ce-841d5025c5d0@akurei.me> References: <115b144c-8470-2738-20ce-841d5025c5d0@akurei.me> Message-ID: <20201203104202.lxksealpxq4clrot@aragog.localdomain> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Michael Duell wrote: > Please delete the package arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro from AUR. I disowned it. There's a "Submit request" link in the "package actions" box: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Requests Florian -- me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) | https://www.qutebrowser.org https://bruhin.software/ | https://github.com/sponsors/The-Compiler/ GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mail at akurei.me Thu Dec 3 11:23:59 2020 From: mail at akurei.me (Michael Duell) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:23:59 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Please delete arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro In-Reply-To: <20201203104202.lxksealpxq4clrot@aragog.localdomain> References: <115b144c-8470-2738-20ce-841d5025c5d0@akurei.me> <20201203104202.lxksealpxq4clrot@aragog.localdomain> Message-ID: <933c76b5-3086-0f44-b279-e5606ea99cdc@akurei.me> Sorry, my bad. Thanks! On 03/12/2020 11.42, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Please delete the package arm-none-eabi-gcc74-linaro from AUR. I disowned it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 236 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From foxboron at archlinux.org Sat Dec 5 23:56:59 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:56:59 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne In-Reply-To: <20201128235506.uflk42frz4e7dkru@anathema> References: <1789ea8a-c195-7d8d-7181-8c0cc4556321@archlinux.org> <20201128235506.uflk42frz4e7dkru@anathema> Message-ID: <20201205235659.lql4fpcjmv5cypaa@anathema> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:55:21AM +0100, Morten Linderud wrote: > Hi everyone! > > A little bit overdue but the discussion period is over. I apologize for missing > the deadline by a day. > > > I have started the voting > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=126 The voting has ended and the results are in: Yes No Abstain Total Voted Participation 43 1 4 48 Yes 84.21% Congratulations Remi! Welcome to the Trusted User team :) -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From seblu at seblu.net Sun Dec 6 00:37:49 2020 From: seblu at seblu.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Luttringer) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 01:37:49 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne In-Reply-To: <20201205235659.lql4fpcjmv5cypaa@anathema> References: <1789ea8a-c195-7d8d-7181-8c0cc4556321@archlinux.org> <20201128235506.uflk42frz4e7dkru@anathema> <20201205235659.lql4fpcjmv5cypaa@anathema> Message-ID: On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 00:56 +0100, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:55:21AM +0100, Morten Linderud wrote: > > > Congratulations Remi! Welcome to the Trusted User team :) > Bravo and welcome ?? Cheers, S?bastien "Seblu" Luttringer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From orhunparmaksiz at gmail.com Sat Dec 12 17:03:45 2020 From: orhunparmaksiz at gmail.com (orhun) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:03:45 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun Message-ID: Dear Arch Linux Trusted Users & Developers, The intent of this mail is to apply for the role of Trusted User with the confirmation/sponsorship of Sven-Hendrik Haase and Levente Polyak. -----BEGIN APPLICATION BLOCK----- INTRODUCTION My name is Orhun Parmaks?z and I use the name orhun/orhunp on most of the platforms. I'm currently studying software engineering and working as a backend developer at a social media startup. I like to work my way through the software world by getting involved in open source projects [0] and trying to create unique and interesting tools. It's my hobby/job to work on Linux specific software so I can say that I'm getting more familiar with Linux concepts in general as time goes. In the meantime, I'm trying to get a grip on Arch Linux specific topics like its build system since it's the main distribution that I use/learn for years. Thus, I package & maintain the software that I like/use in AUR [1] for experiencing different scenarios and learning new techniques. It's also important for me to engage with the community and get involved in events when I'm able to. One example would be this year's Arch Conf which I recapped the things I learned about packaging Rust applications [2]. So I'd like to keep learning new things and be useful at the same time by becoming a Trusted User for taking a role in AUR and maintaining community packages as every Trusted User does. In the long term, I believe that I can contribute to the Arch projects as I gain experience and knowledge by working in the field. EXPERIENCE Although I mostly use Rust and Go recently, I have worked with languages like C, Python, and Java in the past. I believe that the words about "knowing" a programming language is cheap so it's strongly encouraged to check the projects that I write with them. Since the general mantra in software development is "learn by practice", it's likely for me to learn a new technology by using it. Apart from those, I often write shell scripts to manage various things in my system [3] such as the semi-automation of releasing a new version of a package in AUR or performing system-related trivial tasks. Briefly, I can say that I'm fluent in Rust, Go, C, and still sharpening my shell scripting skills. PROJECTS/CONTRIBUTIONS I'd like to plug some of the open source projects that I wrote over the years as a reference to the previous section: - kmon: Linux kernel manager and activity monitor [4] - menyoki: Screen{shot,cast} and perform ImageOps on the command line [5] - pkgtop: Interactive package manager and resource monitor [6] - zps: A small utility for listing and reaping zombie processes [7] Contributing to the tools/libraries that I use is something that I do from time to time for adding particular features or fixing specific bugs [8]. But recently I have been contributing to the open source projects based on my activities on AUR. Mostly I'm trying to share my ideas and propose some fixes that I discovered while working on the upstream [9]. HOW CAN I HELP? I'm aiming to turn my motivation and enthusiasm in regards to the Arch Linux project into professional and valuable contributions since I learn fast and adapt to the changes quickly. My first step towards that goal was to start maintaining packages in AUR and I still do due to the fact that I feel like I should somehow give back to the community. I think the packaging is an interesting topic and I'm experiencing/learning new things by doing it. As for now, my purpose is to adopt/maintain Rust, Go, C, and Python packages in the community repository, move some of my favorite packages about networking like gping [10] and ali [11] to there and help with the tooling of reproducible builds. My interactions with the packages and the Trusted Users also taught me they are responsible for crucial tasks. And I believe that I'm at a point in my life that I can take such responsibilities regardless of how challenging the tasks are. I can also manage my priorities and time well for taking a role as a Trusted User. Although I want to help with the essential duties like keeping an eye on AUR (reviewing requests, looking into security issues, etc.) and maintaining packages in the community repository, I should also say that one of my goals for the future is to develop Arch Linux specific projects and contribute to the existing ones. I'm sure that I'll get to the point where I have enough context and experience quickly with the help of the rest of the team if the application succeeds. So that's why I believe becoming a Trusted User and helping out on the packaging issues is definitely a good place for me to start contributing more concretely to the Arch Linux project. SPONSORS - Sven-Hendrik Haase (svenstaro) - Levente Polyak (anthraxx) [0] https://github.com/orhun [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/orhun [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_g6xZ0DbJg [3] https://github.com/orhun/dotfiles [4] https://github.com/orhun/kmon [5] https://github.com/orhun/menyoki [6] https://github.com/orhun/pkgtop [7] https://github.com/orhun/zps [8] https://github.com/TheNeikos/textwidth-rs/pull/1 [9] https://github.com/Skallwar/suckit/pull/98 [10] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gping [11] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ali -----END APPLICATION BLOCK----- Thank you all for taking the time to consider my application. Best Regards, Orhun Parmaks?z -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From anthraxx at archlinux.org Sat Dec 12 17:23:09 2020 From: anthraxx at archlinux.org (Levente Polyak) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:23:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <60e54f69-bd98-ff68-96c7-35bef3805f30@archlinux.org> Hey folks, I hereby confirm my sponsorship. I believe Orhun would be a great Trusted User. Considering his motivation, knowledge, projects and packages make a good candidate for this role :) cheers, Levente -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From svenstaro at gmail.com Sat Dec 12 17:40:48 2020 From: svenstaro at gmail.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:40:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0e4d5d97-618a-7c81-c3ce-5fd7792c5418@gmail.com> Hello, I have no idea who this is and I haven't talked to this user before. However, considering they maintain a lot of Rust software, I think they're safe and would make a great addition to the team. Just kidding. I talked to Orhun a fair bit, went over the majority of their packages and I think they'd make a great addition to the team. I hereby confirm my sponsorship. Since Levente already gave his confirmation, let the discussion period begin! Cheers, Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From foxboron at archlinux.org Sun Dec 13 22:14:42 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:42 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20201213221442.ln6eskfpvz2geuu5@anathema> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 08:03:45PM +0300, orhun via aur-general wrote: > Dear Arch Linux Trusted Users & Developers, Yo! > The intent of this mail is to apply for the role of Trusted User with the > confirmation/sponsorship of Sven-Hendrik Haase and Levente Polyak. Good luck with the application. > HOW CAN I HELP? > > I'm aiming to turn my motivation and enthusiasm in regards to the Arch > Linux project into professional and valuable contributions since I > learn fast and adapt to the changes quickly. My first step towards > that goal was to start maintaining packages in AUR and I still do due > to the fact that I feel like I should somehow give back to the > community. I think the packaging is an interesting topic and I'm > experiencing/learning new things by doing it. As for now, my > purpose is to adopt/maintain Rust, Go, C, and Python packages in the > community repository, move some of my favorite packages about > networking like gping [10] and ali [11] to there and help with the tooling > of reproducible builds. Both ali and gping are packages with limited use (the projects and packages are months old). Are there any packages you intend to help co-maintain in the repositories? Any orphaned packages in the repositories that would be of interest? -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at shyamin.com Sun Dec 13 23:30:06 2020 From: me at shyamin.com (Shyamin Ayesh) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 05:00:06 +0530 Subject: [aur-general] Submit updated package build to the AUR - hey Message-ID: Hi, I'm new to this mailing list and don't know if I'm submitting the question to the right one. Please forgive me if I'm doing something wrong. I tried to submit new AUR package for the HTTP load testing tool called hey written in golang and it got failed to "git push" because of the origin repository is not empty. It seems like there is already a repository with past work and I can't submit new package because of that reason. When I try to navigate to the package page I can't find the package. Repository: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/?h=hey Package: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hey/ ( 404 - not found ) Thanks ! -- Shyamin Ayesh mobile: 0775251479 email: me at shyamin.com From eschwartz at archlinux.org Sun Dec 13 23:34:37 2020 From: eschwartz at archlinux.org (Eli Schwartz) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:34:37 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Submit updated package build to the AUR - hey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 12/13/20 6:30 PM, Shyamin Ayesh via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to this mailing list and don't know if I'm submitting the question > to the right one. Please forgive me if I'm doing something wrong. > > I tried to submit new AUR package for the HTTP load testing tool called hey > written in golang and it got failed to "git push" because of the origin > repository is not empty. It seems like there is already a repository with > past work and I can't submit new package because of that reason. When I try > to navigate to the package page I can't find the package. > > Repository: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/?h=hey > Package: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hey/ ( 404 - not found ) You're in luck -- it was deleted from the AUR due to being added to the official repos! https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/hey/ Or, well, I guess you're not in luck if you really wanted that learning experience of maintaining a package. In that case, feel free to find more cool software to maintain instead. ;) ... Note that deleted packages in the AUR retain their git backing history even when delisted, for historical tracking purposes. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From orhunparmaksiz at gmail.com Mon Dec 14 00:20:01 2020 From: orhunparmaksiz at gmail.com (orhun) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 03:20:01 +0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun In-Reply-To: <20201213221442.ln6eskfpvz2geuu5@anathema> References: <20201213221442.ln6eskfpvz2geuu5@anathema> Message-ID: <3057a623-9b29-df45-0f8a-4170c064d53a@gmail.com> On 12/14/20 1:14 AM, Morten Linderud wrote: > Good luck with the application. Thanks! > Both ali and gping are packages with limited use (the projects and > packages are months old). Are there any packages you intend to help > co-maintain in the repositories? Any orphaned packages in the > repositories that would be of interest? Sure, here are some packages that I'd like to co-maintain: - ripgrep [0] - sd [1] - mdp [2] - dog [3] - findomain [4] - binwalk [5] Currently orphaned: - xdo [6] - mypaint [7] - dumb [8] - catfish [9] - youtube-viewer [10] [0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/ripgrep/ [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/sd/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mdp/ [3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/dog/ [4] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/findomain/ [5] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/binwalk/ [6] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/xdo/ [7] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mypaint/ [8] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/dumb/ [9] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/catfish/ [10] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/youtube-viewer/ Regards, Orhun Parmaks?z -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From xyne at archlinux.ca Tue Dec 15 05:07:06 2020 From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:07:06 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU applications, discussion periods and "no" votes. Message-ID: <20201215060706.2f75d761@ares.localdomain> Hi all, In at least one recent TU application, there was not a single criticism or negative remark during the discussion period and yet there was still a "no" vote in the result. A "no" vote is an objection and it is important to bring it up during the discussion period so that other TUs may take it into consideration when voting. It also gives the candidate the opportunity to address it, which itself can be very informative during the discussion period. I am not trying to call anyone out. It may well be the case that someone missed the discussion period or misclicked while voting, or has a personal objection or a blood vendetta against the candidate's family spanning back 5 generations that they are not allowed to talk about. I absolutely do not want to know who voted "no" or why. I just want to encourage everyone to participate in the discussion period when they have something to add. Regards, Xyne From foxboron at archlinux.org Tue Dec 15 08:12:07 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:12:07 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU applications, discussion periods and "no" votes. In-Reply-To: <20201215060706.2f75d761@ares.localdomain> References: <20201215060706.2f75d761@ares.localdomain> Message-ID: <20201215081207.whykp2vaefgkhy55@anathema> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:07:06AM +0100, Xyne wrote: > Hi all, Yo! > In at least one recent TU application, there was not a single criticism or > negative remark during the discussion period and yet there was still a "no" > vote in the result. A "no" vote is an objection and it is important to bring it > up during the discussion period so that other TUs may take it into > consideration when voting. It also gives the candidate the opportunity to > address it, which itself can be very informative during the discussion period. > > I am not trying to call anyone out. It may well be the case that someone missed > the discussion period or misclicked while voting, or has a personal objection > or a blood vendetta against the candidate's family spanning back 5 generations > that they are not allowed to talk about. I absolutely do not want to know who > voted "no" or why. I just want to encourage everyone to participate in the > discussion period when they have something to add. There was some confusion regarding the difference between not voting, "No" and "Abstain" on IRC a month or two back. This was cleared up in this particular scenario, but it might be the case that someone doesn't feel like they can make an informed decision and instead of "Abstain" click the "No" button. > Regards, > Xyne Cheers! -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From svenstaro at gmail.com Fri Dec 18 00:47:42 2020 From: svenstaro at gmail.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:47:42 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Anyone want to have netdata? Message-ID: <14dba738-5c32-7fb4-a9e0-8c17f4cb212b@gmail.com> Hey, I don't really use netdata anymore. Does anyone want to pick it up? I'd drop it to AUR otherwise. Cheers, Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From bartosz at algrim.pl Fri Dec 18 09:01:07 2020 From: bartosz at algrim.pl (Bartosz Bartczak) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:01:07 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] openoffice - out of date many time (not working package in aur) Message-ID: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> Hello all. I see that we have problem with "openoffice" in aur. Look: $ yaourt -S openoffice ==> Downloading openoffice PKGBUILD from AUR... x .SRCINFO x PKGBUILD kikislater commented on 2020-06-19 05:25 LordofNoob commented on 2020-06-20 09:18 kikislater commented on 2020-06-22 05:11 micwoj92 commented on 2020-11-05 08:32 gameboy commented on 2020-12-08 13:06 openoffice 4.1.7-1? (2019-10-17 11:05) ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) ==> ------------------------------------ ==> n ==> openoffice dependencies: ?- freetype2 (already installed) ?- glibc>=2.5 (already installed) ?- gtk2>=2.10.4 (already installed) ?- hicolor-icon-theme (already installed) ?- desktop-file-utils (already installed) ?- shared-mime-info (already installed) ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] ==> ------------------------------------ ==> ==> Building and installing package ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.7-1 (Thu Dec 17 22:08:40 2020) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... ? -> Downloading v4.1.7-x86_64... ? % Total??? % Received % Xferd? Average Speed?? Time??? Time???? Time? Current ???????????????????????????????? Dload? Upload?? Total?? Spent??? Left? Speed 100?? 306? 100?? 306??? 0???? 0?? 2528????? 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--? 2508 ? 0???? 0??? 0???? 0??? 0???? 0????? 0????? 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--???? 0 curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading http://apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.7_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz ??? Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] ==> ----------------------------------- ==> n AUR see old version openoffice 4.1.7-1 not 4.1.8 and can't download package from source to build. Maintainters nothink doing from: "Last Updated: 2019-10-17 11:05" upgrade openoffice not working I was asking Organization Apache Open Office that can I be official maintainer Apache Open Office for Archlinux and get answer from Pedro (pedro.lino at mailbox.org) that can I maintainer, he answer me don't see any problem. I'm Linux experience user, a bit of a programmer, administrator, security administrator in company for last 20 years. But start my road with linux was about 1995r. Program Open Office/Apache Open Office I was using/repair a simple bug/sending ticket to bugzilla from about 15 years. In my company Libre Office had too many bugs, too often broken own files xls and he was too much unstable. Too many time we must spend for repair LO. We must change it for something much stable like Apache Open Office. I think so that can help us example fix it this problem if we wont my help. Becking to problem. When I was fixit build file get next error: yaour -S openoffice [...] ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] ==> ------------------------------------ ==> ==> Building and installing package ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.8-1 (Thu Dec 17 23:42:02 2020) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... ? -> Downloading v4.1.8-x86_64... ? % Total??? % Received % Xferd? Average Speed?? Time??? Time???? Time? Current ???????????????????????????????? Dload? Upload?? Total?? Spent??? Left? Speed 100? 161M? 100? 161M??? 0???? 0? 1279k????? 0? 0:02:08? 0:02:08 --:--:-- 1547k ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with md5sums... ??? v4.1.8-x86_64 ... Passed ==> Extracting sources... ? -> Extracting v4.1.8-x86_64 with bsdtar ==> Entering fakeroot environment... ==> Starting package()... ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-mandriva-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-redhat-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-suse-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core02-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core06-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-help-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core01-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-res-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-ogltrans-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-javafilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-gnome-integration-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-ure-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-ooolinguistic-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core07-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core04-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-pyuno-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-images-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core03-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-graphicfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-ooofonts-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ? -> Completing package find: 'opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib': No such file or directory sed: no input files ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). ??? Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] ==> ----------------------------------- ==> But in "/opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" not "opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" i see files. Ok next correct patch in build file (add "/") and get next error: [...] ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm ? -> Completing package sed: couldn't open temporary file /opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib/sedlrxOz8: Permission denied ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). ??? Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] ==> ----------------------------------- ==> interesting... I was execute yaourt like user not as root. I was wrote email for forum at archlinux.org and dev at archlinux.org but get message that is it wrong places for this problem. Maybe this time send email to correct places. ?Best Regards Bartosz Bartczak From yupadmin at gmail.com Fri Dec 18 11:16:48 2020 From: yupadmin at gmail.com (YUP) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:16:48 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] openoffice - out of date many time (not working package in aur) In-Reply-To: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> References: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> Message-ID: Hi Bartosz, You can use yaourt -G libbreoffice or yaourt -G openoffce, it will download libreoffce and openoffice source PKGBUILDs. Then you can fix these two packages and ask for maintainer's or co-maintainer's rights in your AUR dashboard. Take a look on "Submit Request" on the right side. When you granted those rights, you can submit fixed packages and maintain them. Best, Yarema On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:01 AM Bartosz Bartczak wrote: > > Hello all. > > I see that we have problem with "openoffice" in aur. > Look: > > $ yaourt -S openoffice > > ==> Downloading openoffice PKGBUILD from AUR... > x .SRCINFO > x PKGBUILD > kikislater commented on class="date">2020-06-19 05:25 > > LordofNoob commented on class="date">2020-06-20 09:18 > > kikislater commented on class="date">2020-06-22 05:11 > > micwoj92 commented on 2020-11-05 > 08:32 > > gameboy commented on 2020-12-08 > 13:06 > > openoffice 4.1.7-1 (2019-10-17 11:05) > ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) > ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) > ==> ------------------------------------ > ==> n > > ==> openoffice dependencies: > - freetype2 (already installed) > - glibc>=2.5 (already installed) > - gtk2>=2.10.4 (already installed) > - hicolor-icon-theme (already installed) > - desktop-file-utils (already installed) > - shared-mime-info (already installed) > > > ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] > ==> ------------------------------------ > ==> > ==> Building and installing package > ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.7-1 (Thu Dec 17 22:08:40 2020) > ==> Checking runtime dependencies... > ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... > ==> Retrieving sources... > -> Downloading v4.1.7-x86_64... > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time > Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left > Speed > 100 306 100 306 0 0 2528 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- > --:--:-- 2508 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- > --:--:-- 0 > curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found > ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading > http://apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.7_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz > Aborting... > ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. > ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] > ==> ----------------------------------- > ==> n > > > AUR see old version openoffice 4.1.7-1 not 4.1.8 and can't download package from source to build. > Maintainters nothink doing from: > "Last Updated: 2019-10-17 11:05" > upgrade openoffice not working > > I was asking Organization Apache Open Office that can I be official maintainer Apache Open Office for Archlinux and get answer from Pedro (pedro.lino at mailbox.org) that can I maintainer, he answer me don't see any problem. > I'm Linux experience user, a bit of a programmer, administrator, security administrator in company for last 20 years. But start my road with linux was about 1995r. > Program Open Office/Apache Open Office I was using/repair a simple bug/sending ticket to bugzilla from about 15 years. > In my company Libre Office had too many bugs, too often broken own files xls and he was too much > unstable. Too many time we must spend for repair LO. We must change it for something much stable like Apache Open Office. > I think so that can help us example fix it this problem if we wont my help. > > Becking to problem. > When I was fixit build file get next error: > > yaour -S openoffice > > [...] > > ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] > ==> ------------------------------------ > ==> > ==> Building and installing package > ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.8-1 (Thu Dec 17 23:42:02 2020) > ==> Checking runtime dependencies... > ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... > ==> Retrieving sources... > -> Downloading v4.1.8-x86_64... > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time > Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left > Speed > 100 161M 100 161M 0 0 1279k 0 0:02:08 0:02:08 --:--:-- > 1547k > ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with md5sums... > v4.1.8-x86_64 ... Passed > ==> Extracting sources... > -> Extracting v4.1.8-x86_64 with bsdtar > ==> Entering fakeroot environment... > ==> Starting package()... > ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-mandriva-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm > ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-redhat-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm > ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-suse-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core02-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core06-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-help-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core01-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-res-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-ogltrans-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-javafilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-gnome-integration-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-ure-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-ooolinguistic-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core07-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core04-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-pyuno-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-images-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core03-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-graphicfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-ooofonts-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > -> Completing package > find: 'opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib': No such file or > directory > sed: no input files > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). > Aborting... > ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. > ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] > ==> ----------------------------------- > ==> > > But in "/opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" not "opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" i see files. > Ok next correct patch in build file (add "/") and get next error: > > [...] > ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm > ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm > -> Completing package > sed: couldn't open temporary file > /opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib/sedlrxOz8: Permission denied > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). > Aborting... > ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. > ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] > ==> ----------------------------------- > ==> > > interesting... > I was execute yaourt like user not as root. > > I was wrote email for forum at archlinux.org and dev at archlinux.org but get message that is it wrong places for this problem. > Maybe this time send email to correct places. > > > Best Regards > Bartosz Bartczak > > From baptiste at bitsofnetworks.org Sun Dec 20 14:17:12 2020 From: baptiste at bitsofnetworks.org (Baptiste Jonglez) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:17:12 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU resignation Message-ID: Hi, I have been less active in Arch for some time. I'm involved in many other projects that end up taking lots of time, and as a result I don't have the required time / energy / interest for Arch anymore. When my last Arch machine died recently after 10 years of loyal Arch service, it was a good sign that I should make this official. With that being said, I am resigning as a TU. I've had some, let's say, "disagreements" with a few members of the team over the years, but overall it was a positive experience. Keep up the good work, and take care of this delicate balance between technical excellence and community-minded approach. Now for practical matters, here are my packages in [community]: auto-multiple-choice babeld camlp5 confuse coq coq-doc coqide dia dune fastd fig2dev gephi gobby hevea horst icmake ipv6calc kea kea-devel-docs lablgtk3 lesspipe libinfinity libuecc msgpack-c ocaml-cairo ocaml-num perl-locale-codes python-antlr4 python-latexcodec python-oset python-pybtex python-pybtex-docutils python-sphinxcontrib-bibtex python-sphinx-testing quilt radcli remake tcptrace xplot yodl Feel free to adopt them in [community], and I can also move some to the AUR if somebody is interested to maintain them. I also have a few packages in the AUR that I am going to orphan: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=M&K=zorun Regards, Baptiste -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bartosz at algrim.pl Sun Dec 20 18:32:04 2020 From: bartosz at algrim.pl (Bartosz Bartczak) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:32:04 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] openoffice - out of date many time (not working package in aur) In-Reply-To: References: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> Message-ID: Hi Yerema, No problem, if we accept I can care of openoffice, but libreoffice have active maintainer but if we wont I can care it too. All ready (version 4.17 and new 4.1.8 too) if get green light can push it to git. $ pacman -Qi openoffice Name??????????? : openoffice Version???????? : 4.1.8-1 Description???? : Apache OpenOffice Architecture??? : x86_64 URL???????????? : http://www.openoffice.org Licenses??????? : Apache Groups????????? : None Provides??????? : None Depends On????? : freetype2? glibc>=2.5? gtk2>=2.10.4? hicolor-icon-theme? desktop-file-utils? shared-mime-info Optional Deps?? : apr-util: adds apr support [installed] ????????????????? java-environment: adds java support [installed] ????????????????? gconf: adds additional gnome support [installed] ????????????????? gstreamer0.10-base: some gstr-plugins to support multimedia content, e.g. in impress [installed] ????????????????? mesa: for the OGLTrans extension of impress [installed] ????????????????? mime-types: provides /etc/mime.types [installed] ????????????????? nss: adds support for signed files/macros [installed] ????????????????? openoffice-de-bin: adds additional German language pack ????????????????? python2: adds python support [installed] ????????????????? raptor1: adds rdf support ????????????????? sqlite: adds sqlite support [installed] Required By???? : None Optional For??? : None Conflicts With? : openoffice-base-bin-unstable Replaces??????? : openoffice-base-bin Installed Size? : 386.45 MiB Packager??????? : Unknown Packager Build Date????? : Sun Dec 20 00:27:26 2020 Install Date??? : Sun Dec 20 00:31:06 2020 Install Reason? : Explicitly installed Install Script? : No Validated By??? : None W dniu 18.12.2020 o?12:16, YUP via aur-general pisze: > Hi Bartosz, > You can use yaourt -G libbreoffice or yaourt -G openoffce, > it will download libreoffce and openoffice source PKGBUILDs. Then you > can fix these two packages and ask for maintainer's or co-maintainer's > rights in your AUR dashboard. Take a look on "Submit Request" on the > right side. When you granted those rights, you can submit fixed > packages and maintain them. > Best, > Yarema > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:01 AM Bartosz Bartczak wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I see that we have problem with "openoffice" in aur. >> Look: >> >> $ yaourt -S openoffice >> >> ==> Downloading openoffice PKGBUILD from AUR... >> x .SRCINFO >> x PKGBUILD >> kikislater commented on > class="date">2020-06-19 05:25 >> >> LordofNoob commented on > class="date">2020-06-20 09:18 >> >> kikislater commented on > class="date">2020-06-22 05:11 >> >> micwoj92 commented on 2020-11-05 >> 08:32 >> >> gameboy commented on 2020-12-08 >> 13:06 >> >> openoffice 4.1.7-1 (2019-10-17 11:05) >> ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) >> ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) >> ==> ------------------------------------ >> ==> n >> >> ==> openoffice dependencies: >> - freetype2 (already installed) >> - glibc>=2.5 (already installed) >> - gtk2>=2.10.4 (already installed) >> - hicolor-icon-theme (already installed) >> - desktop-file-utils (already installed) >> - shared-mime-info (already installed) >> >> >> ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] >> ==> ------------------------------------ >> ==> >> ==> Building and installing package >> ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.7-1 (Thu Dec 17 22:08:40 2020) >> ==> Checking runtime dependencies... >> ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... >> ==> Retrieving sources... >> -> Downloading v4.1.7-x86_64... >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time >> Current >> Dload Upload Total Spent Left >> Speed >> 100 306 100 306 0 0 2528 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- >> --:--:-- 2508 >> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- >> --:--:-- 0 >> curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found >> ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading >> http://apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.7_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz >> Aborting... >> ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. >> ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] >> ==> ----------------------------------- >> ==> n >> >> >> AUR see old version openoffice 4.1.7-1 not 4.1.8 and can't download package from source to build. >> Maintainters nothink doing from: >> "Last Updated: 2019-10-17 11:05" >> upgrade openoffice not working >> >> I was asking Organization Apache Open Office that can I be official maintainer Apache Open Office for Archlinux and get answer from Pedro (pedro.lino at mailbox.org) that can I maintainer, he answer me don't see any problem. >> I'm Linux experience user, a bit of a programmer, administrator, security administrator in company for last 20 years. But start my road with linux was about 1995r. >> Program Open Office/Apache Open Office I was using/repair a simple bug/sending ticket to bugzilla from about 15 years. >> In my company Libre Office had too many bugs, too often broken own files xls and he was too much >> unstable. Too many time we must spend for repair LO. We must change it for something much stable like Apache Open Office. >> I think so that can help us example fix it this problem if we wont my help. >> >> Becking to problem. >> When I was fixit build file get next error: >> >> yaour -S openoffice >> >> [...] >> >> ==> Continue building openoffice ? [Y/n] >> ==> ------------------------------------ >> ==> >> ==> Building and installing package >> ==> Making package: openoffice 4.1.8-1 (Thu Dec 17 23:42:02 2020) >> ==> Checking runtime dependencies... >> ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... >> ==> Retrieving sources... >> -> Downloading v4.1.8-x86_64... >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time >> Current >> Dload Upload Total Spent Left >> Speed >> 100 161M 100 161M 0 0 1279k 0 0:02:08 0:02:08 --:--:-- >> 1547k >> ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with md5sums... >> v4.1.8-x86_64 ... Passed >> ==> Extracting sources... >> -> Extracting v4.1.8-x86_64 with bsdtar >> ==> Entering fakeroot environment... >> ==> Starting package()... >> ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-mandriva-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm >> ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-redhat-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm >> ==> Skipping openoffice4.1.8-suse-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core02-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core06-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-help-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core01-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-res-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-ogltrans-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-impress-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-javafilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-gnome-integration-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-ure-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-ooolinguistic-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core07-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core04-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-pyuno-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-base-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-draw-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-images-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core03-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-graphicfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-brand-en-US-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-calc-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-en-US-math-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-ooofonts-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> -> Completing package >> find: 'opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib': No such file or >> directory >> sed: no input files >> ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). >> Aborting... >> ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. >> ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] >> ==> ----------------------------------- >> ==> >> >> But in "/opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" not "opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib" i see files. >> Ok next correct patch in build file (add "/") and get next error: >> >> [...] >> ==> Extracting openoffice-xsltfilter-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-writer-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-core05-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice-onlineupdate-4.1.8-9803.x86_64.rpm >> ==> Extracting openoffice4.1.8-freedesktop-menus-4.1.8-9803.noarch.rpm >> -> Completing package >> sed: couldn't open temporary file >> /opt/openoffice4/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib/sedlrxOz8: Permission denied >> ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). >> Aborting... >> ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openoffice. >> ==> Restart building openoffice ? [y/N] >> ==> ----------------------------------- >> ==> >> >> interesting... >> I was execute yaourt like user not as root. >> >> I was wrote email for forum at archlinux.org and dev at archlinux.org but get message that is it wrong places for this problem. >> Maybe this time send email to correct places. >> >> >> Best Regards >> Bartosz Bartczak >> >> From me at iyanmv.com Sun Dec 20 18:40:22 2020 From: me at iyanmv.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Iy=E1n_M=E9ndez?= Veiga) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:40:22 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] openoffice - out of date many time (not working package in aur) In-Reply-To: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> References: <8be3129b-0c36-6ca4-c5d0-0f350484c8dd@algrim.pl> Message-ID: <6445313.i5msDNjmHC@master> Hi Bartosz, On Friday, 18 December 2020 10:01:07 CET Bartosz Bartczak wrote: > Hello all. > > I see that we have problem with "openoffice" in aur. Why would you want to use openoffice from AUR when you have libreoffice in [extra]? > Look: > $ yaourt -S openoffice Also, maybe it's time to switch to a different AUR helper [1], yaourt has been discontinued for 3 years now. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_helpers [2] https://github.com/archlinuxfr/yaourt/issues/382#issuecomment-437461631 -- Iy?n M?ndez Veiga | Physicist GPG: 0x422E3694311E5AC1 From foxboron at archlinux.org Sun Dec 20 19:59:33 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:59:33 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20201220195933.jdpfi45xd6u2jcyi@anathema> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 03:17:12PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I have been less active in Arch for some time. I'm involved in many other > projects that end up taking lots of time, and as a result I don't have the > required time / energy / interest for Arch anymore. When my last Arch > machine died recently after 10 years of loyal Arch service, it was a good > sign that I should make this official. > > With that being said, I am resigning as a TU. I've had some, let's say, > "disagreements" with a few members of the team over the years, but overall > it was a positive experience. Keep up the good work, and take care of > this delicate balance between technical excellence and community-minded > approach. Thanks for the work over the years :)! Hopefully we'll see you around if you end up resurrecting the Arch machine of yours :D -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From danielbermond at gmail.com Mon Dec 21 01:05:41 2020 From: danielbermond at gmail.com (Daniel Bermond) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:05:41 -0300 Subject: [aur-general] TU resignation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 20/12/2020 11:17, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I have been less active in Arch for some time. I'm involved in many other > projects that end up taking lots of time, and as a result I don't have the > required time / energy / interest for Arch anymore. When my last Arch > machine died recently after 10 years of loyal Arch service, it was a good > sign that I should make this official. > > With that being said, I am resigning as a TU. I've had some, let's say, > "disagreements" with a few members of the team over the years, but overall > it was a positive experience. Keep up the good work, and take care of > this delicate balance between technical excellence and community-minded > approach. Thank you Baptiste for your work through these years and for caring about how Arch Linux should be conducted. I wish you all the best in your life journey and also hope that you can come back some day. -- Best regards, Daniel Bermond -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From michael.kogan at gmx.net Sat Dec 26 10:17:41 2020 From: michael.kogan at gmx.net (Michael Kogan) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:17:41 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) Message-ID: Hi guys, I maintain the multiload-ng AUR packages, in particular xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3. After the recent Xfce 4.16 update the gtk2 version stopped building, so I would like to delete xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and somehow migrate the users to xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3 (which should be renamed to just xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng if possible). What are my options making the transition as smooth as possible? Thanks for any input and merry Christmas! Michael From archlinux at nicohood.de Sat Dec 26 11:00:46 2020 From: archlinux at nicohood.de (NicoHood) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 12:00:46 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <74fe97ad-e6c2-2524-a42a-33784337fc8d@nicohood.de> Hi Michael, you can use 'replaces': https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#replaces If the package should stay on the aur this still does not help much, so you'd need to write a comment to the aur package page and tell users to move to the new package. I'd keep it a month and then open a deletion request. People with an aur helper will possibly miss the change if they dont subscribe on updates, but they will possibly notice the missing package, I am not sure. No matter what, you have no other option than that (correct me if i am wrong). Cheers Nico On 12/26/20 11:17 AM, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: > Hi guys, > > I maintain the multiload-ng AUR packages, in particular > xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3. After > the recent Xfce 4.16 update the gtk2 version stopped building, so I would > like to delete xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and somehow migrate the users > to xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3 (which should be renamed to just > xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng if possible). What are my options making the > transition as smooth as possible? > > Thanks for any input and merry Christmas! > Michael > From lundberg.emil at gmail.com Sat Dec 26 11:01:59 2020 From: lundberg.emil at gmail.com (Emil Lundberg) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 12:01:59 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Michael, I had the same problem the other day, with package passmenu-notify-git replacing pass-patched-passmenu-notify-git. There is the `replaces` directive in PKGBUILD, but I don't think that really works to automate replacement for AUR packages. I don't know if there's a standard procedure, but here's what I ended up doing. At the bare minimum, add and pin to the replaced package a comment documenting the new package to use. I also flagged my package as out of date. Next, I changed the package description to "DEFUNCT: Use instead". Then I intentionally broke the package by removing all the sources and having `package()` just print an error message redirecting to the new package, then unconditionally fail. I also added `epoch=1` to the PKGBUILD to help this version of the package override other releases. If this seems too aggressive for your package, you could instead just add a warning message in `package()` and in the post-install/post-upgrade script. In my case the old package was already broken. Hope that helps with some ideas on how to approach the issue! I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts too. /Emil On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, 11:18 Michael Kogan via aur-general, < aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I maintain the multiload-ng AUR packages, in particular > xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3. After > the recent Xfce 4.16 update the gtk2 version stopped building, so I would > like to delete xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and somehow migrate the users > to xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3 (which should be renamed to just > xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng if possible). What are my options making the > transition as smooth as possible? > > Thanks for any input and merry Christmas! > Michael > From michael.kogan at gmx.net Sat Dec 26 12:12:46 2020 From: michael.kogan at gmx.net (Michael Kogan) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 13:12:46 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi guys, thanks for your input! I tried to create a new xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng package and ran into the issue that the AUR's git repository ssh:// aur at aur.archlinux.org/xfce4-multiload-ng-plugin.git was not empty but had some outdated PKGBUILD in it. But it had no .SRCINFO file and (probably because of the missing .SRCINFO) the package also wasn't listed on the AUR page. Can I just replace the outdated PKGBUILD with the new one, add a .SRCINFO and things will work out, or do I need a TU to have a look into it? Thanks again, Michael From archlinux at nicohood.de Sat Dec 26 13:05:40 2020 From: archlinux at nicohood.de (NicoHood) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:05:40 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 12/26/20 1:12 PM, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: > Hi guys, > > thanks for your input! I tried to create a new xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng > package and ran into the issue that the AUR's git repository ssh:// > aur at aur.archlinux.org/xfce4-multiload-ng-plugin.git was not empty but had > some outdated PKGBUILD in it. But it had no .SRCINFO file and (probably > because of the missing .SRCINFO) the package also wasn't listed on the AUR > page. Can I just replace the outdated PKGBUILD with the new one, add a > .SRCINFO and things will work out, or do I need a TU to have a look into it? > > Thanks again, > Michael > Clone this git, override it, make a commit and push the changes. From michael.kogan at gmx.net Sat Dec 26 14:39:09 2020 From: michael.kogan at gmx.net (Michael Kogan) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 15:39:09 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Done, thanks! Eventually I did all of the above (a "replaces" field in the new package which seems to have no impact though, an echo output with the deprecation message, a deprecation message in the package description, a comment on the AUR page and an out of date notification with again a deprecation message). Let's see how it goes! :) From svenstaro at gmail.com Sun Dec 27 00:19:43 2020 From: svenstaro at gmail.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 01:19:43 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] TU application - orhun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9a60cab1-14af-bb72-59a1-440cb20b6d16@gmail.com> And thusly ends this tumultuous discussion period. The time has come to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=127 xoxo, Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From alad at archlinux.org Sun Dec 27 01:30:28 2020 From: alad at archlinux.org (alad) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 02:30:28 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <88b8fb41-a248-ca10-59cc-7f6920925fc2@archlinux.org> On 26/12/2020 15:39, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: > Done, thanks! Eventually I did all of the above (a "replaces" field in the > new package which seems to have no impact though, an echo output with the > deprecation message, a deprecation message in the package description, a > comment on the AUR page and an out of date notification with again a > deprecation message). Let's see how it goes! :) As mentioned, replace does nothing at all for AUR packages (unless you put them in a local repo). You can add conflicts/replaces though, such that users don't have to manually remove the old package before installing the new one. Alad From alad at archlinux.org Sun Dec 27 01:34:24 2020 From: alad at archlinux.org (alad) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 02:34:24 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: <88b8fb41-a248-ca10-59cc-7f6920925fc2@archlinux.org> References: <88b8fb41-a248-ca10-59cc-7f6920925fc2@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <171c9014-ca44-ac95-106f-fffa0d9a3d52@archlinux.org> On 27/12/2020 02:30, alad via aur-general wrote: > On 26/12/2020 15:39, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: >> Done, thanks! Eventually I did all of the above (a "replaces" field >> in the >> new package which seems to have no impact though, an echo output with >> the >> deprecation message, a deprecation message in the package description, a >> comment on the AUR page and an out of date notification with again a >> deprecation message). Let's see how it goes! :) > > As mentioned, replace does nothing at all for AUR packages (unless you > put them in a local repo). > > You can add conflicts/replaces though, such that users don't have to > manually remove the old package before installing the new one. > > Alad ...and I meant conflicts/provides in the last part. Alad From relliott at umn.edu Mon Dec 28 23:43:51 2020 From: relliott at umn.edu (Ryan S. Elliott) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:43:51 -0600 (CST) Subject: [aur-general] account creation confimation email missing Message-ID: <4336f967-49ec-90b8-c94-7c9389316750@umn.edu> Hello, I created an account a few hours ago and have not received a confirmation email to reset my password. Using the https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/ page also does not seem to work. Can someone help me get my account confirmed? Thanks! Ryan Elliott From polyzen at archlinux.org Tue Dec 29 04:48:48 2020 From: polyzen at archlinux.org (Daniel M. Capella) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:48:48 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] account creation confimation email missing In-Reply-To: <4336f967-49ec-90b8-c94-7c9389316750@umn.edu> References: <4336f967-49ec-90b8-c94-7c9389316750@umn.edu> Message-ID: On December 28, 2020 6:43:51 PM EST, "Ryan S. Elliott via aur-general" wrote: > Hello, > > I created an account a few hours ago and have not received a > confirmation > email to reset my password. Using the > https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/ > page also does not seem to work. > > Can someone help me get my account confirmed? > > Thanks! > > Ryan Elliott The devops team have fixed this. IIUC you should have received the email by now. -- Best, Daniel From relliott at umn.edu Tue Dec 29 15:58:53 2020 From: relliott at umn.edu (Ryan S. Elliott) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:58:53 -0600 (CST) Subject: [aur-general] account creation confimation email missing In-Reply-To: References: <4336f967-49ec-90b8-c94-7c9389316750@umn.edu> Message-ID: <947b5dda-d767-341e-2cd-be16cf36313@umn.edu> Yes, I've been able to activate my account. Many thanks, Ryan On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Daniel M. Capella wrote: > On December 28, 2020 6:43:51 PM EST, "Ryan S. Elliott via aur-general" wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I created an account a few hours ago and have not received a >> confirmation >> email to reset my password. Using the >> https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/ >> page also does not seem to work. >> >> Can someone help me get my account confirmed? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ryan Elliott > > The devops team have fixed this. IIUC you should have received the email by now. > > -- > Best, > Daniel > -- Ryan S. Elliott, Ph.D. Professor & Director of Graduate Studies Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota (612) 624-2376 (626-1558 fax) https://z.umn.edu/relliott download vCard OpenPGP Public key (576D4997C4D51D92) ---------- In this sense rational mechanics will be the science of the motions that result from arbitrary forces, and of the forces that are required for arbitrary motions, accurately set forth and proved. Newton, (as quoted by Truesdell, 1968, p95) ---------- From j.r at jugendhacker.de Wed Dec 30 12:23:12 2020 From: j.r at jugendhacker.de (j.r) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:23:12 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing Message-ID: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> Hi, I just ran a update of the AUR packages I have installed and noticed that fprintd-clients, open-fprintd and python-validity just disappeared within a day or so. I already searched on through the aur-requests@ list but couldn't find anything about any of those three packages. Does somebody know what happened with them / why they where removed? Thanks j.r From foxboron at archlinux.org Wed Dec 30 12:41:02 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:41:02 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> Message-ID: <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 01:23:12PM +0100, j.r via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I just ran a update of the AUR packages I have installed and noticed that > fprintd-clients, open-fprintd and python-validity just disappeared within a > day or so. I already searched on through the aur-requests@ list but couldn't > find anything about any of those three packages. > > Does somebody know what happened with them / why they where removed? > > Thanks > > j.r User deleted their account which deleted the packages. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 From marcin at marcin.co Wed Dec 30 13:05:50 2020 From: marcin at marcin.co (Marcin Wieczorek) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:05:50 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> Message-ID: <20201230130550.grieebrnw7dfkvjg@samluks> On 20/12/30 13:41, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > User deleted their account which deleted the packages. I would expect the packages to be orphaned, I didn't know they get deleted. Anyways one can bring them back to life by cloning and pushing even if a package doesn't exist in aurweb. Marcin Wieczorek -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From j.r at jugendhacker.de Wed Dec 30 15:09:56 2020 From: j.r at jugendhacker.de (j.r) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:09:56 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <20201230130550.grieebrnw7dfkvjg@samluks> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> <20201230130550.grieebrnw7dfkvjg@samluks> Message-ID: <0a9f697d-2f90-199b-b941-65d8824efef7@jugendhacker.de> Yeah I would also expect that they would become orphaned. But anyway I brought them back by pushing to the repos. Thanks for your quick help (also thanks to Morten) j.r > On 20/12/30 13:41, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> User deleted their account which deleted the packages. > > I would expect the packages to be orphaned, I didn't know they get > deleted. Anyways one can bring them back to life by cloning and pushing > even if a package doesn't exist in aurweb. > > Marcin Wieczorek > From g.schlisio at dukun.de Wed Dec 30 15:23:35 2020 From: g.schlisio at dukun.de (Georg) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:23:35 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <0a9f697d-2f90-199b-b941-65d8824efef7@jugendhacker.de> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> <20201230130550.grieebrnw7dfkvjg@samluks> <0a9f697d-2f90-199b-b941-65d8824efef7@jugendhacker.de> Message-ID: <51bfd8a6-18ff-4b61-5d08-40782b7bc33a@dukun.de> > Yeah I would also expect that they would become orphaned. I would even say, it is a bug and should be fixed. After all, a package is not your property, but your privilege (and and subsequent duty) to maintain. Maybe worth consideration. g From lfleischer at archlinux.org Wed Dec 30 15:32:26 2020 From: lfleischer at archlinux.org (Lukas Fleischer) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:32:26 -0500 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> Message-ID: <160934234638.37166.1541376139105409854@typhoon> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 07:41:02, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > User deleted their account which deleted the packages. Are you sure that that's what's happened? All foreign keys on the PackageBases table are "ON DELETE SET NULL". Additionally, we programmatically set these fields to NULL before deleting an account. If you have evidence that packages were deleted as a direct consequence of an account deletion, that's most likely unintended. Please open a bug in the aurweb bug tracker with some more details. Thanks! Lukas From foxboron at archlinux.org Wed Dec 30 16:00:07 2020 From: foxboron at archlinux.org (Morten Linderud) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:00:07 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Packages disappearing In-Reply-To: <160934234638.37166.1541376139105409854@typhoon> References: <47518beb-1e4b-bade-e38b-0f6da43fc1c8@jugendhacker.de> <20201230124102.ja5xhp42kiupcpl5@anathema> <160934234638.37166.1541376139105409854@typhoon> Message-ID: <20201230160007.xey2iovuxjlks4wm@anathema> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:32:26AM -0500, Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 07:41:02, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > > User deleted their account which deleted the packages. > > Are you sure that that's what's happened? All foreign keys on the > PackageBases table are "ON DELETE SET NULL". Additionally, we > programmatically set these fields to NULL before deleting an account. > > If you have evidence that packages were deleted as a direct consequence > of an account deletion, that's most likely unintended. Please open a bug > in the aurweb bug tracker with some more details. > > Thanks! > Lukas I'm actually a bit unsure, I only have surrounding incidents where the same happened. One of the r- package maintainers deleted their account and subsequently removed a bunch of r packages in AUR. My reaction to this was mostly "oh, probably intended!". I wonder if this only happens when the maintainer creates "fresh packages" and deleted their account? -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From michael.kogan at gmx.net Wed Dec 30 20:24:52 2020 From: michael.kogan at gmx.net (Michael Kogan) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 21:24:52 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: <171c9014-ca44-ac95-106f-fffa0d9a3d52@archlinux.org> References: <88b8fb41-a248-ca10-59cc-7f6920925fc2@archlinux.org> <171c9014-ca44-ac95-106f-fffa0d9a3d52@archlinux.org> Message-ID: Should those go into the new package or into the deprecated ones or into all of them? Currently I have conflicts/replaces in all three PKGBUILDs. So I just exchange replaces with provides in all of them, or I better remove those fields from some of the PKGBUILDs? Thanks! Am So., 27. Dez. 2020 um 02:35 Uhr schrieb alad via aur-general < aur-general at archlinux.org>: > On 27/12/2020 02:30, alad via aur-general wrote: > > As mentioned, replace does nothing at all for AUR packages (unless you > > put them in a local repo). > > > > You can add conflicts/replaces though, such that users don't have to > > manually remove the old package before installing the new one. > > > > Alad > > ...and I meant conflicts/provides in the last part. > > Alad > From alad at archlinux.org Wed Dec 30 22:58:15 2020 From: alad at archlinux.org (alad) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 23:58:15 +0100 Subject: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated) In-Reply-To: References: <88b8fb41-a248-ca10-59cc-7f6920925fc2@archlinux.org> <171c9014-ca44-ac95-106f-fffa0d9a3d52@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <56e84e32-3cba-8f45-66d0-d03b5a053e4f@archlinux.org> On 30/12/2020 21:24, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: > Should those go into the new package or into the deprecated ones or into > all of them? Currently I have conflicts/replaces in all three PKGBUILDs. So > I just exchange replaces with provides in all of them, or I better remove > those fields from some of the PKGBUILDs? Thanks! Since the deprecated ones would likely be unlisted from the AUR anyway, I'd say it only matters for the new package. Alad > Am So., 27. Dez. 2020 um 02:35 Uhr schrieb alad via aur-general < > aur-general at archlinux.org>: > >> On 27/12/2020 02:30, alad via aur-general wrote: >>> As mentioned, replace does nothing at all for AUR packages (unless you >>> put them in a local repo). >>> >>> You can add conflicts/replaces though, such that users don't have to >>> manually remove the old package before installing the new one. >>> >>> Alad >> ...and I meant conflicts/provides in the last part. >> >> Alad >>