[aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

[Manhong Dai]

You are right that I don't know what 'out of state' or 'out of date' or
'out of whatever' is. All I know is that I suddenly lost the ownership and
will have to change my cluster maintenance code tomorrow.....

In terms of pkgver or pkgbuild.  Now you said nobody cares about pigver,
guess who said this sentence below?
'You couldn't even get something as simple as the pkgver right'

  It turned out I can read and actually remember....


Best,
Manhong
Sent from phone

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:46 PM Doug Newgard <scimmia at archlinux.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:38:02 -0400
> Manhong Dai via aur-general <aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > I actually did read your email. You said I cannot get a simple thing such
> > as pkgver right.
> >
> > Let me explain to you, from your point of view, you certainly want to
> have
> > some rule or guideline to make all the package  has the same standard.
> That
> > is understandable and it is what make Arch Linux popular. I would love to
> > be compliant with the rule whenever I have the resource, and I did with
> all
> > other my AUR packages.
> >
> > From my point of view, a pkgver is not the point here. I do need to make
> my
> > modified SGE package can be compiled with the latest SSL, GCC, other
> Linux
> > contribution, and can be used to upgrade an old node without losing
> > configuration. No matter how bad a pkgver is defined, an Arch Linux with
> a
> > working SGE is away better, right?
> >
> > The problem is actually not on my side. Your request system has my email
> > address, I sent you a request after the package was adopted, some
> > bystanders figured  out I didn't get any reply and sent your reply to me,
> > That is when I knew that the request is also in the mail list, and such
> > email list exists......
> >
> > Because you are attacking my capability, and I believe everybody who can
> > read will know your claim is actually baseless, I did ignore your
> personal
> > attack in my previous email.
> >
> > Yes, I can say sorry about ignoring hat.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Manhong
> > Sent from phone
> >
>
> So you read it and you're STILL top posting in violation of the rules. And
> making up something called "out of state" which doesn't exist. And claiming
> that you have to be on a mailing list when it's been explained, multiple
> times,
> that you don't. You claim you're reading, now try understanding.
>
> Nobody cares what your point of view is on pkgver. It's obvious to pretty
> much
> anyone that's ever written, or even read, a PKGBUILD.
>