[aur-general] Is base an implicit dependency?
Archange
archange at archlinux.org
Tue Jul 27 11:17:59 UTC 2021
Hi,
Le 27/07/2021 à 11:26, Cedric Girard via aur-general a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-07-27 11:20, Marcin Wieczorek wrote:
>>> The most important meta package is base. It contains a minimal package
>>> set that defines a basic Arch Linux installation. It includes:
>> Without base you wouldn't be building the package on a system that can
>> be called Arch Linux. What's the point then?
>
> I am misusing devtools feature to build in a clean chroot, then? Or is
> there a bug in those tools?
No, you’re not, and systemd must be added to makedepends if required at
build time. The maintainer is wrong.
systemd is not part of base-devel, and base is not part of official
building chroots (they were reasons for this, but I don’t remember them
at the moment).
Also, I would still keep base content in dependencies (when required) in
any case, because we could drop packages from base at any point (they
are open tickets for some of them already).
Regards,
Bruno/Archange
More information about the aur-general
mailing list