[aur-general] Issue a warning while (re)packaging a binary package?

[Jonathon Fernyhough]

On 18/06/2021 14:05, Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> a new version of a (binary) package I'm maintaining (clockify-desktop) requires an 
> executable /tmp directory to run.
> 

My immediate questions would be why, and is this an upstream issue?

Or, is an executable /tmp a reasonable assumption? 🤔

J

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20210618/6056f64b/attachment.sig>