[aur-general] packaging question for optional-wayland optional-xorg package

[Jonathon Fernyhough]

On 17/10/2021 05:52, todd freed via aur-general wrote:
> Is this a use-case for split-package?

Very likely. I'd probably package them as $pkgname-wayland and 
$pkgname-xorg and have them both provide $pkgname.

(Though, if one backend was the upstream default then I might package 
that as $pkgname and the alternative as e.g. $pkgname-xorg)

J
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20211017/7eba9718/attachment.sig>