[aur-general] Using the bug tracker to patch outdated packages (was: TU Application - blakkheim)

Alexander Epaneshnikov alex19ep at archlinux.org
Thu Aug 25 19:37:39 UTC 2022


On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Leonidas,
> 
> > What stops you from opening bug report and submitting patches for those
> > now without being a TU? If these are in core/extras your options would
> > be the same as you have now, right?
> 
> Wait, is this actually a thing?
> 
> As a non-TU, one thing that has deterred me from using the bug tracker
> to submit patches for outdated packages is this warning:
> 
> > Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR.
> > Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
> 
> followed by:
> 
> > REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
> 
> and similarly, on the wiki:
> 
> > Reasons for not being a bug
> > […]
> > A package which is not-up-to-date. Use the Flag Package Out-of-Date feature on Arch's packages website.
> 
> That’s a total of three warnings. Enough for me to decide to not take
> chances. Your suggestion seems to contradict those warnings though.
> What am I missing?

I think it's worth separating a package update
(most often it's just a change to pkgver and hash sums)
and fixing a bug, improving pkgbuild, or adding features.

as a maintainer, I would like to receive the second and never see the first.

> Regards
> Claudia (aka Auerhuhn)

-- 
Sincerely, Alexander | Trusted User
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 6184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20220825/143b86d6/attachment.sig>


More information about the aur-general mailing list