[aur-requests] [PRQ#3328] Deletion Request for exfalso

Bruno Pagani bruno.n.pagani at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 17:20:36 UTC 2015

Le 18/05/2015 00:12, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
> On 17/05, Bruno Pagani wrote:
>> Indeed. It’s exfalso without quodlibet (I only use the former, and a lot
>> of other people too), another way to do this would be splitting the repo
>> package into four (or more, if splitting l10n):
>> – /quodlibet/
>> – /exfalso/
>> – /quodlibet-libs/, on which one the previous two should depends
>> – /quodlibet-l10n/ with /usr/share/locale files (and, as said above,
>> eventually split that one for each locale)
>> Should I open a bug against quodlibet packaging on Arch?
> You could, but I doubt it would be done. It's not really the arch way
> to split packages.

As a matter of fact, such a request (split exfalso from quodlibet) was
already made before (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32338), and was
rejected because exfalso has to depends on most of the libs from
quodlibet. However, the two packages don’t have the same dependencies,
and that’s why a split package make sense to me. Should I reopen the the
issue or continue with my AUR package?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/attachments/20150608/94093be7/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-requests mailing list