[aur-requests] [PRQ#4886] Deletion Request for shashlik-bin

[LoneVVolf]

On 02-03-16 18:09, Tom Pitcher wrote:
> Is this standardised convention? Happy to switch mine to compiling from source
> if so.
>
> On Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:13:36 GMT Jameson wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:30 PM <notify at aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
>>> tjbp [1] filed a deletion request for shashlik-bin [2]:
>>>
>>> This package already exists under "shashlik". Could do with a
>>> shashlik-git package, however.
>>>
>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tjbp/
>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/shashlik-bin/
>> If we remove my -bin package, shashlik should be renamed since it is built
>> from a binary package, and not source.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jameson.

Yes, general convention is that packages built from source use "pure" 
packagename .
Any packages using binaries should have a -bin suffix.