[aur-requests] [PRQ#7587] Deletion Request for hunspell-en-gb

[Mauro Santos]

On 24-02-2017 13:23, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> Le 24/02/2017 à 13:20, Mauro Santos via aur-requests a écrit :
>> On 24-02-2017 04:22, notify at aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>>> Eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for hunspell-en-gb [2]:
>>>
>>> obsolete now that [extra]/hunspell-en is a split package.
>>>
>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hunspell-en-gb/
>>>
>> I have created this package and hunspell-en-us[1] because originally the
>> enhancement requests[2-3] to split hunspell-en where not accepted.
>>
>> Given that now it is a split package I have no objections to having this
>> and hunspell-en-us deleted from the AUR.
>>
>> Please cc me if you reply because I'm not subscribed to aur-requests.
>>
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hunspell-en-us/
>> [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24947
>> [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30504
> 
> It was accepted at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50471.
> 
> I’ve opened a follow-up ticket for hunspell-fr at
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53075. Should hyphen-{en,fr} and
> mythes-{en,fr} follow?

It would make sense to have them split also, for consistency and because
of the same reason hunspell-en was split. If the split of hyphen-en and
mythes-en is made then two other packages[1-2] could be deleted from the
AUR.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-en-us/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mythes-en-us/

> 
> Deleting the package from the AUR.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruno
> 


-- 
Mauro Santos