[aur-requests] [PRQ#12391] Deletion Request for libretro-picodrive-ex-git Accepted

[Eli Schwartz]

On 8/30/18 9:56 AM, Benjamin Hodgetts wrote:
>> Not to mention that these are obvious duplicates, and you just
>> systematically
>> ignored the rules.
> 
> This wasn't a duplicate. One works, one doesn't. If they were duplicates
> then that wouldn't be the case.
> 
> Some of my old temporary packages were fine to be deleted though as the
> "originals" have since been fixed. But this was not one such case.

Allow me to clarify the rules.

As a TU, I am telling you in an unambiguous manner, those are duplicates.

"The other package is broken" is *NOT* a valid reason to upload a
duplicate package. If you cannot accept that fact, then we may end up
having a problem.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/attachments/20180830/1acfe869/attachment.asc>