[aur-requests] [PRQ#18087] Orphan Request for python-pydantic
me at tonybenoy.com
Sun Mar 1 08:34:30 UTC 2020
Thanks for your reply.
1) The whole point of checks/test cases are to make sure that the package works correctly. If the whole point is to do --nocheck defeats the purpose of running testcases in the first place.
2) The whole point of asking to add a git flag is so that there can be a pypi version in the case this fails or for someone like me who would use it as a part of starlette and would need the stable release of pypi.
3)The first comment about failing assertion is at 2019-12-20 11:13 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pydantic/#comment-721472) hence I assumed that you were unavailable.
Thanks and Regards
I'd recommend you encrypt mails sent to me. You can find my pgp key at https://tinyurl.com/y9v2mrt9
On Mar 1 2020, at 9:19 am, Eric Berquist <pentavalentcarbon at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Tests are not failing, and if they were, you could use `--nocheck`.
> 2. Just because the package source comes from a release tarball put on GitHub doesn't make it a `-git` version.
> 3. Just because the maintainer doesn't respond after 5 days doesn't mean they're unavailable.
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:09 PM <notify at aur.archlinux.org (mailto:notify at aur.archlinux.org)> wrote:
> > tonybenoy  filed an orphan request for python-pydantic :
> > The package is broken as tests is failing. Also the package is a git
> > version and not from pypi. Also I have a package python-fastapi which
> > is dependent on pydantic. I dont think the maintainer is avaliable.
> >  https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tonybenoy/
> >  https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pydantic/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aur-requests