[aur-requests] [PRQ#22879] Deletion Request for pipewire-nightly

[Eli Schwartz]

On 12/31/20 9:05 AM, Haochen Tong wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-31 at 07:22 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> 05:58 PM <elibrokeit> hexchain: have you considered that it's
>> entirely
>> not ok to have two packages, one named "pipewire-git" and one named
>> "pipewire-nightly", which build the exact same version of the code
>> and
>> differ only in whether or not they have a gstreamer subpackage?
>> Regardless, there has been discussion in #archlinux-aur about this.
>> My
>> advice was to create a "gst-plugin-pipewire-git" PKGBUILD that
>> configures pipewire, then runs `ninja
>> 05:58 PM <elibrokeit> libgstpipewire.so` to build the one file, then
>> installs it manually. It would depend on pipewire-git=$pkgver to
>> ensure
>> the same commit is used for pipewire and for the gst plugin, and you
>> could install the disputed pipewire-git package + the new package.
>> 05:59 PM <elibrokeit> And again, the only problem I have here is your
>> terrible pkgname habit making it impossible for aur users to know
>> which
>> package to install
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks for the reminder, I didn't catch this for some reason. However
> in my opinion this is too much hassle for both maintainer and users. I
> still think the best thing for users would be to install pipewire-
> whatever and still expect a fully working system.

At any rate, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gst-plugin-pipewire-git 
now exists.


-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/attachments/20201231/ad603cc0/attachment.sig>