[aur-requests] [PRQ#28274] Deletion Request for petalinux-v2020.1

Alex Henrie alexhenrie24 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 21 16:28:11 UTC 2021


On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:01 AM Amin Vakil <info at aminvakil.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/20/21 20:38, Alex Henrie wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:19 AM <notify at aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> aminvakil [1] filed a deletion request for petalinux-v2020.1 [2]:
> >>
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/petalinux-v2021.1/ is already
> >> present.
> >>
> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aminvakil/
> >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/petalinux-v2020.1/
> >
> > I'm surprised that petalinux-v2020.1, petalinux-v2020.2, and
> > petalinux-v2020.3 were deleted from the AUR. It would be nice to have
> > the older versions in the AUR because the latest version (2021.1) is
> > not 100% compatible. And the AUR has lots of old versions of other
> > packages like gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin, so why not petalinux?
> >
> > $ yay -Ssq gcc-arm-none-eabi
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-92
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-83
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-63
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-72
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-73
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-102
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-93
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-49
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-82
> > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin
>
> Thanks for bringing this up, I've submitted deletion requests for all of
> them as well.

Are you going to delete all the old versions of GCC for x86 too
(gcc34, gcc43, gcc44, gcc45, gcc46, gcc47, gcc48, gcc49, gcc5, gcc53,
gcc6, gcc7, gcc8, gcc9)? And if so, why? gcc10 was even promoted out
of the AUR.

-Alex


More information about the aur-requests mailing list