<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Le 17/05/2015 23:45, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150517214517.GA19598@leeloo.kyriasis.com"
type="cite">On 17/05, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 17/05, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:notify@aur.archlinux.org">notify@aur.archlinux.org</a> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">ArchangeGabriel [1] filed a deletion
request for exfalso [2]:
<br>
<br>
I need to reupload this package with a pkgbase (quodlibet)
variable,
<br>
and AFAIK, this goes through removal of the existing package.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Could you upload a quodlibet package without the exfalso split
package in it and then request a merge if you want the new
package to keep the votes and comments?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Actually, scratch that, you won't be able to upload a quodlibet
package because it exists in the repos and the repo package has
exfalso in it. Is there anything different at all in this
package?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Indeed. It’s exfalso without quodlibet (I only use the former, and a
lot of other people too), another way to do this would be splitting
the repo package into four (or more, if splitting l10n):<br>
<br>
– <i>quodlibet</i><br>
– <i>exfalso</i><br>
– <i>quodlibet-libs</i>, on which one the previous two should
depends<br>
– <i>quodlibet-l10n</i> with /usr/share/locale files (and, as said
above, eventually split that one for each locale)<br>
<br>
Should I open a bug against quodlibet packaging on Arch?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Bruno<br>
</body>
</html>