<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 26/10/2019 à 18:26, Maarten de Vries
      a écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPWpf+yVCF7vxO+bd-D6En2UTzpzgejtYz9NPrRVzSNreDw25A@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 18:06, nl6720 <<a
          href="mailto:nl6720@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">nl6720@gmail.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Saturday, 26 October
            2019 18:56:10 EEST Bruno Pagani wrote:<br>
            > Le 26/10/2019 à 17:05, notify--- via aur-requests a
            écrit :<br>
            > > nl6720 [1] filed a deletion request for
            opensmtpd-libressl [2]:<br>
            > > <br>
            > > opensmtpd 6.4.2p1-1 in the community repo is built
            against LibreSSL.<br>
            > <br>
            > This might not be the case for the next release, which
            is going to be<br>
            > packaged very soon. However I’m not sure if there is an
            interest for<br>
            > both a LibreSSL and OpenSSL variant.<br>
            > <br>
            > Regards,<br>
            > Bruno/Archange<br>
            <br>
            Are you sure that would be wise?<br>
            The OpenSMTPD 6.6.0 release notes say that they don't really
            test OpenSMTPD <br>
            with OpenSSL. And it also lacks some features when built
            against OpenSSL.<br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
            class="gmail_default">I'm fine with deleting the package
            either way. I only uploaded it initially to get a recent
            version of openstmd. If it's not deleted I will probably
            orphan it.<br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
            class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
            class="gmail_default"> I would personally stick with
            libressl for openstmd, for the same reason nl6720 mentions.<br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
            class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
            class="gmail_default">-- Maarten<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Thanks both of you for your input, also upstream still recommends
      LibreSSL and intends to move to libtls only at some point, so yes,
      keeping LibreSSL seems the way to go.</p>
    <p>Regards,<br>
      Bruno<br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>