<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
On 26/11/19 2:27, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:notify@aur.archlinux.org">notify@aur.archlinux.org</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:pkg-request-16805@aur.archlinux.org">
<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true"
style="font-size: 16px;" lang="x-unicode">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for the-darkmod-tweaked [2]:
After discussion in the package comments for thedarkmod-bin, it was
determined that the custom installer used in the former package
"darkmod" violated the rules of submission on numerous levels.
The package was reimplemented by a Trusted User, and for good measure
cleaned up and renamed to something more closely matching upstream
intentions, but for all this, the core issue with
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/the-darkmod-tweaked" moz-do-not-send="true">https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/the-darkmod-tweaked</a> had nothing to do
whether mv is better than cp, or whatever else this justification
entails:
```
So I'm providing an alternative version for this package, called "the-
darkmod-tweaked", with the following enhancements over the official
bundle:
Separated saved games and downloaded mission repository for each
user.
Missions cache auto-cleanup.
Enhanced installation speed compared with the official installer.
```
No, this is not acceptable. Your new package is still obfuscation and
violates the rules of submission.
Your "tweaks" in comparison with thedarkmod-bin do not answer the
question: "why was the previous package orphaned via moderator
action".
You may not re-upload a package which was deemed inadmissible to the
AUR, and simply rename the pkgname in order to justify its existence.
You are REQUIRED to either:
- first defend your claim that the initial judgment "this is unfit for
the AUR" was incorrect, or
- fix the problems
You have done neither.
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/" moz-do-not-send="true">https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/</a>
[2] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/the-darkmod-tweaked/" moz-do-not-send="true">https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/the-darkmod-tweaked/</a></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Even when I thought that could piss you off, I genuinely believed
that would fall within the rules.<br>
<br>
Now you suspended my account, and destroyed all my work on Arch.<br>
<br>
But that was a less risky decision than keeping you around. Your
purpose was never to enforce good practices but to boycott.<br>
<br>
What you call quality standards won't allow me to reach my goals.
You don't care about the contents of the book, you only care about
how well it's written.<br>
<span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400;
letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
!important; float: none;"></span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34,
34); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal;
font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align:
left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
!important; float: none;"></span>
</body>
</html>