[pacman-dev] [PATCH] don't care about a to-be-replaced package's newer version

[Aurelien Foret]

VMiklos wrote:
>> Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests?
> 
> no, there isn't.

OK.

>here is an updated patch:
> http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/replace_dont_upgrade_old2.diff

This one won't work: the continue command can only bypass the end of the 
code from the _current_ loop. As a consequence, it must be called 
outside the double for() loop.

I applied your first patch with the proposed rework.
--
Aurelien