[pacman-dev] [PATCH] don't care about a to-be-replaced package's newer version
aurelien at archlinux.org
Sat Jan 14 03:19:02 EST 2006
>> Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests?
> no, there isn't.
>here is an updated patch:
This one won't work: the continue command can only bypass the end of the
code from the _current_ loop. As a consequence, it must be called
outside the double for() loop.
I applied your first patch with the proposed rework.
More information about the pacman-dev