[pacman-dev] libalpm and backends

VMiklos vmiklos at frugalware.org
Tue Mar 14 07:35:58 EST 2006

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:40:26PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Finally, I think pacman 3.0 is the right moment to implement it.

hm, not sure about this. the libarchive patch was rejected as "we have
enough changes for 3.0". i think this backend change is much more
problematic than the libarchive one...

what about first just do the TODO, release 3.0, and _after_ start to
work on this?

udv / greetings,

Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list