[pacman-dev] Future pacman development (3.2/4.0)

[Roman Kyrylych]

2007/8/22, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>:
> Anyway, I also think pacman would benefit from a rewrite, but for it to be
> really helpful, a deep understanding of the code and its current flaws is
> needed. And I think I would need 10 years for getting to this point..
> But you are probably able to do a nice cleanup :)
>

On the other hand - taking part in a complete rewrite from prototyping
stages to working implementation makes involvement more people in
coding alot easier IMHO, because newcomers won't have to dig through
the complete code with its workarounds and hacks trying to understand
WTH is going there.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)