[pacman-dev] Bug in pactest suite

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Sat Dec 29 01:46:24 EST 2007


On Dec 23, 2007 6:23 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 23, 2007 2:01 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 2007 6:55 AM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > I noticed, that with fileconflict*.py the .FILELISTs of generated
> > > packages isn't generated correctly: the symlinks are missing. So we can
> > > ignore the results of these pactests now.
> >
> > .FILELIST was killed off ages ago. I think even before pacman 3.0
> >
> > Considering you tracked this bug down, could you maybe... I dunno,
> > even give us some sort of source line or something if you're not going
> > to provide a patch?
>
> Um...I've thought it should be killed off, but that really wasn't done.
> <http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=scripts/makepkg.sh.in;h=ef7bae5029d459c25a0cadfb7ad3716d099bb464;hb=9addd88a7d12c8c8445ec226e2837afe01e660b7#l788>
>
> It is true that we no longer require it for pacman. Has it been long
> enough then that we can safely remove it from makepkg (meaning there
> are no holdovers from  2.9.8 that we want to worry about)?

Oh yes, I am merging two things here. We removed "filelist" generation
from makepkg, and skipped the dependence on .FILELIST in pacman
itself.

I'd say we can get rid of the generation in makepkg and always
generate it on install. It makes more sense to me.

Additionally, regarding non-3.0 holdovers: they're screwed anyway with
current/core rename and all that, so they're non-issues.




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list