[pacman-dev] Release Schedule for 3.0
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 7 11:36:02 EST 2007
On 2/7/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/2/7, Douglas Soares de Andrade <dsandrade at gmail.com>:
> > There is another issue i want to discuss. The License field shoud not be
> > required ? Today it is just a warning and i guess we should make it required,
> > so we can keep track of what is opensource, what is proprietary and so on.
> > People usually will tend to just ignore the warning and situation will be as
> > it is today.
> > What do you guys think ?
> I agree. It must be required.
I think it should be required EVENTUALLY, but for right now, so we
don't break 95% of the official packages and AUR packages, we leave it
as a warning and move it as "required" later on (3.1 release?)
More information about the pacman-dev