[pacman-dev] community is active by default
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 16:28:19 EST 2007
On 2/13/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de> wrote:
> Otherwise there would be no different in being a TU or Dev. Well, [community]
> shouldn`t be dangerous but its packages or more unstable.
That's incorrect. The community repo, in general, has *less
important* packages, not *less stable* packages.
Think about it this way:
If a package goes from community to extra, what makes it magically
more stable? The Maintainer: tag in the PKGBUILD?
More information about the pacman-dev