[pacman-dev] community is active by default

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 16:28:19 EST 2007

On 2/13/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de> wrote:
> Otherwise there would be no different in being a TU or Dev. Well, [community]
> shouldn`t be dangerous but its packages or more unstable.

That's incorrect.  The community repo, in general, has *less
important* packages, not *less stable* packages.

Think about it this way:
If a package goes from community to extra, what makes it magically
more stable?  The Maintainer: tag in the PKGBUILD?

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list