[pacman-dev] community is active by default

[Roman Kyrylych]

2007/2/13, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>:
> 2007/2/13, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> > On 2/13/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de> wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 22:26:17 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > > Hmmm. Why not? What's wrong with reporting bugs there? If we assume
> > > > we have an "AUR/Community" section in flyspray, and give the TUs
> > > > accounts and access, what's the problem? Bug reporting is not a bad
> > > > thing.
> > >
> > > Well, at the moment bugs cannot assigned to TUs. Perhaps it might be a good
> > > idea to introduce a community-section; but i don`t think we should discuss
> > > this at pacman-dev ;-)
> >
> > Tada! <http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?tasks=all&project=2>
> >
> > What the heck is the above used for? Why can't it be used for what we
> > are talking about?
>
> Wrong!
> Quote: "If you have bugs relating to packages in [community] or
> unsupported, please do not file bugs here, contact the maintainers
> directly." ;-)
> This is used for reporting bugs in AUR scripts, not in packages.

Did anyone miss my message about bugreporting and AUR comments? Bugs
in AUR packages (including Community) were and should be reported by
adding a comment to package's page. That's why comments feature
exists.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)