[pacman-dev] RC 2007.02.12
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 14 13:10:32 EST 2007
On 2/14/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/2/14, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> > On 2/14/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I don't think we should prompt that the local package is "up to date"
> > > when in fact it is not, and the user is explicitly syncing it.
> > Actually, yeah - the changes are a bit more than just wording, so I'll
> > wait until I get home.
> > Basically, on an -Su, there should be no prompting ("ignoring upgrade
> > blah"), however on an -S, there should be no output from this (it is
> > assumed that -S overrides IgnorePkg and UpgradeDelay, as it's an
> > explicit target).
> What if I want to -S pkgA but don't want to upgrade its dependency pkgB?
> I think IgnorePkg should not be ignored in that case.
That's not what I meant. By "explicit target" I mean it is explicitly
specified. (pkgA is explicit, pkgB is not, in your example).
More information about the pacman-dev