[pacman-dev] 'replaces' confusion
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 10:21:50 EST 2007
On 2/26/07, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > Where does 'replaces' info belong? I leave the question open, because
> > i have no opinion, but I'd like to do this right - where does it fit
> > best? The /depends file seems more appropriate, as it contains all
> > the "list" info already.
I vote for depends as well. Aren't conflicts and provides already
there too? It seems to fit perfectly with those. I also say we should
try to put it consistently in depends, including in the repos. We may
need to have a rather extended transition period where it is in both,
however, as we should try to be backwards compatible with what pacman2
expects for a while.
More information about the pacman-dev