[pacman-dev] pmdepend_t / pmdepmissing_t accessors

[Dan McGee]

On 7/16/07, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I found the accessors for these two types were rather odd.
> There were only accessors for pmdepmissing_t, but half of them
> were actually accessors for the pmdepend_t field in the pmdepmissing_t
> structure.
> I thought it would make more sense to have accessors for each fields, but I
> could be wrong, so I'll let you decide :)
>
>
> >From 8de572b00ee0a6a3fbf9cd115805bcb17910cf9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:08:48 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] new pmdepend_t / pmdepmissing_t accessors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>


This seems like as good of fix/cleanup as any until we get rid of some
of these possibly extra unnecessary types.

-Dan