[pacman-dev] [patch] alpm_removedeps bug+fix && alpm_depcmp-discussion

[Xavier]

2007/6/18, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
>
> In addition, to assume anything only makes an ass out of u (you) and
> me. I don't want to introduce any functions that depend on a
> particular quirk of our list implementation, especially since this is
> one of the things we have considered changing.
>

To Nagy :
I don't even understand why this assumption is needed :
 * assumptions: alpm_list_add adds new member to the end of the list,
so we can reuse the list pointer

As far as I can tell, this isn't needed, so please explain more in detail :)