[pacman-dev] .la files are back?

[Georg Grabler]

Good to know this information.
I'll keep it in mind that the !libtool isn't default, and explicitely
add it to packages which seem to use libtools.

Thanks,
Georg

On 5/16/07, Essien Ita Essien <me at essienitaessien.com> wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > 2007/5/16, Essien Ita Essien <me at essienitaessien.com>:
> >> Just updated to pacman 3 and looking thru makepkg.conf, I see that the
> >> *default* in the OPTIONS() array is to leave libtool .la files in the
> >> package.
> >>
> >> Wasn't there much-ado-about-la-files sometime last year?
> >
> > Most packages have options=('nolibtool') now (it will be !libtool with time).
> > It was decided that makepkg3 default options should stay the same as makepkg2.
> > This was done for compatability.
> >
> ok... thnx.
>
> cheers,
> Essien
>
> _______________________________________________
> pacman-dev mailing list
> pacman-dev at archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
>