[pacman-dev] scritplet output logging removed?

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 12:31:41 EST 2007

On 11/5/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2007 10:40 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/5/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > And there is no need to use puts/fputs if
> > > you just use a format string correctly: printf("%s", stringtoprint)
> > > instead of printf(stringtoprint), as far as I know.
> >
> > Yeah, that works too - f/puts() is just a little cheaper of a call,
> > but that's me being snarky. I tend to use "++i" because it has the
> > potential to be equal to "i++" or _one_ clock cycle faster 8)
> I would guess GCC is able to optimize calls to printf("%s") quite
> well, in addition to figuring out i++ vs. ++i (especially when there
> are 0 side effects from interchanging them). But that is just a guess.
> :)

Zero side effects if-and-only-if there is no assignment as part of
that expression 8)

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list