[pacman-dev] do we need requiredby?

[Xavier]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:01:21PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 3:35 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Throwing the project manager speak into this here- it isn't getting
> > into 3.1. This will be a great kickoff for 3.2 major changes though.
> 
> You sure you still want to stand by this? I think this change might
> actually close out like 3 or 4 bugs on the 3.1 tracker... I say push
> it, but I'll let you be the judge.
> 

AFAIK, all these bugs were already fixed.

That's also what Nagy pointed out in an earlier mail.
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-November/010024.html

"2. Now the requiredby stuff is expected to work fine (I can bet that
Travis's problem is not a bug now).
3. Throwing requiredby to trash-bin is also throwing our hard work to release
2., too"