[pacman-dev] do we need requiredby?
shiningxc at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 05:42:12 EST 2007
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:01:21PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 3:35 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Throwing the project manager speak into this here- it isn't getting
> > into 3.1. This will be a great kickoff for 3.2 major changes though.
> You sure you still want to stand by this? I think this change might
> actually close out like 3 or 4 bugs on the 3.1 tracker... I say push
> it, but I'll let you be the judge.
AFAIK, all these bugs were already fixed.
That's also what Nagy pointed out in an earlier mail.
"2. Now the requiredby stuff is expected to work fine (I can bet that
Travis's problem is not a bug now).
3. Throwing requiredby to trash-bin is also throwing our hard work to release
More information about the pacman-dev