[pacman-dev] [GIT] The official pacman repository branch, master, updated. v3.0.0-603-g2aa7e69

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 04:26:02 EST 2007

2007/11/18, Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org>:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
> generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
> the project "The official pacman repository".

> commit 829a7b904dcb56aa17cd9279f29385dad2814793
> Author: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>
> Date:   Sat Nov 17 23:35:22 2007 +0100
>     Minor rephrasing of the question asked by -Sc.
>     Suggested by stonecrest on irc :
>     'I think "uninstalled" would be better, as it implies that the package was once
>     installed and since removed. Otherwise a user might wonder why there are
>     non-installed pkgs in cache'
>     Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>

This also includes packages pulled with -Sw[u] but not [yet] installed. ;-)
Though the majority of -Sc candidates will be uninstalled packages anyway.

> commit 8f824e70bbaf9cb2b72103fe378d93e3ded8cdee
> Author: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 15:34:04 2007 +0100
>     Remove the IgnorePkg handling from alpm_pkg_compare_version.
>     And check the IgnorePkg handling is done correctly in the other places.
>     For example, -Qu and -Su will automatically skip the ignored packages (-Su will print a warning),
>     but -S will install ignored packages anyway, because it was asked explicitly.
>     Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com>

The fact that -S <pkgname> ignores IgnorePkg=<pkgname> should be
documented in manpage.

> commit e174865bdc154248b8b8fcf03eaa19da78e0f67b
> Author: Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org>
> Date:   Sat Nov 17 12:56:31 2007 -0600
>     Don't filter package files output based on dir/file status
>     This caused more problems than it solved, especially with -Qlp output
>     and files that are new to the new package.
>     Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org>

So it will be possible to find what an ugly package brought some empty dir. :-)

Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list