[pacman-dev] [PATCH 4/5] Versioned provisions
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 13:13:14 EST 2007
On Nov 18, 2007 8:06 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> == 0 is much clearer, so I'm going to change this back if I pull the
> patch. Let's not take shortcuts in C just because they work- lets make
> the code readable for everyone. It will all get compiled the same way
> anyway. As a general rule, I always want to see an == or != used with
> strcmp- it is just easier to digest.
This is also in the pacman coding guidelines somewhere, for the record.
More information about the pacman-dev