[pacman-dev] conflict and provision versions

Scott Horowitz stonecrest at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 13:42:23 EST 2007

> > Suppose you have a package which depends on provision>=2.0-2
> > * 'provision 2.0' -> OK
> If a devel adds 'provision>=2.0-2' as depend, then this implicitly means that
> not "all" 'provision 2.0-x' version would satisfy this depend; and 'provision
> 2.0' says no info about -x...

I agree with Nagy; I think just about everyone would find 2.0 meeting
a >=2.0-2 provision to be illogical.


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list