[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Remove -F/--freshen operation

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 12:41:48 EST 2007


On Nov 21, 2007 11:31 AM, Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 12:27 PM, Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > This operation made sense in the days before sync DBs existed, but it no
> > longer has the same usefulness it once did.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org>
> > ---
> >  contrib/bash_completion |    6 ++----
> >  contrib/zsh_completion  |   11 +----------
> >  doc/pacman.8.txt        |    4 ----
> >  lib/libalpm/add.c       |   13 ++-----------
> >  lib/libalpm/alpm.h      |    2 +-
> >  pactest/tests/add030.py |   18 ------------------
> >  pactest/tests/add031.py |   18 ------------------
> >  pactest/tests/add032.py |   18 ------------------
> >  src/pacman/pacman.c     |   12 +-----------
> >  9 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 pactest/tests/add030.py
> >  delete mode 100644 pactest/tests/add031.py
> >  delete mode 100644 pactest/tests/add032.py
>
> I'd love to have another sign-off or two from people on the list, so
> when someone later goes "OMG Dan removed the -F operation!" I can at
> least point at the sign-off lines and say "and so did all these
> people".
>
> Just let me know if you agree with the change, and I'll go ahead and
> add your name as a sign-off.

I'll just say this - I didn't even know this op existed, and looking
at it, I'm still not even all that clear on what it does... looks to
be the same functionality as saying 'no' to the "local package is up
to date" question.

Looks good to me




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list