[pacman-dev] [GIT] pacman branch, master now at v3.0.0-434-g48bf088

Tue Oct 2 17:06:32 EDT 2007

On 10/2/07, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> What about packages built with 3.0 that are installed / upgraded with 3.1 ?
> Apparently, for these packages, the build time isn't copied over to the local
> database. But the install date is generated and stored, in UNIX epoch.
>
> I am not saying this behavior is bad or anything, I rather just want to check
> this is the intended behavior :)

Just to see if I understand you - builddate is only valid for remote packages?