[pacman-dev] [GIT] pacman branch, master now at v3.0.0-434-g48bf088

[Dan McGee]

On 10/2/07, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:06:32PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What about packages built with 3.0 that are installed / upgraded with 3.1 ?
> > > Apparently, for these packages, the build time isn't copied over to the local
> > > database. But the install date is generated and stored, in UNIX epoch.
> > >
> > > I am not saying this behavior is bad or anything, I rather just want to check
> > > this is the intended behavior :)
> >
> > Just to see if I understand you - builddate is only valid for remote packages?
> >
>
> Well, now, I don't understand the question. Let me try with an example :
>
> 1) package built and installed with 3.0 :
>
> $ cat /var/lib/pacman/local/sdl-1.2.12-1/desc | grep DATE -A1
> %BUILDDATE%
> Sun Aug  5 13:37:03 2007
> --
> %INSTALLDATE%
> Mon Aug  6 19:59:09 2007
>
> 2) package built with 3.0 but installed with git :
>
> $ cat /var/lib/pacman/local/git-1.5.3.3-1/desc | grep DATE -A1
> %INSTALLDATE%
> 1191220054
>
> 3) package built and installed with git :
>
> $ cat /var/lib/pacman/local/moc-2.5.0_alpha2-1/desc | grep DATE -A1
> %BUILDDATE%
> 1191172788
> --
> %INSTALLDATE%
> 1191173034

Should be fixed in GIT, we just looked into it.

-Dan