[pacman-dev] pacman and maintainers

[Aaron Griffin]

On 10/16/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is pulled from makepkg.conf, and built into the package. I don't
> think modifying packages after they are built is a wise idea.

Agreed. I think a namcap rule should be sufficient here - what do you think Dan?

> To Scott: I guess I'm missing your point here. What is wrong with
> contacting the last packager with any problems?

This was going to be my point. Regardless of maintainer, whoever built
the last package should be responsible for the working state of it.